{"id":"W2026862165","doi":"10.1007/s11252-014-0383-y","title":"Tree cavity availability across forest, park, and residential habitats in a highly urban area","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban Ecosystems","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"College of Science and Health; Directorate for Biological Sciences; DePaul University","keywords":"Habitat; Urban forestry; Wildlife; Woodpecker; Urban ecology; Ecology; Geography; Urbanization; Canopy; Tree canopy; Tree (set theory); Environmental science; Agroforestry; Forestry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002705271,0.00009568488,0.0002492021,0.0007523309,0.0006693176,0.0007543464,0.0004049495,0.0003058854,0.002361353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007638915,0.0001776774,0.0002201267,0.0007739629,0.0006605123,0.0004592124,0.001022527,0.0002414256,0.0001680356],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003425827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003044379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02385288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1061925,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996958,0.0000784911,0.00001967128,0.00008436203,0.00003158982,0.00009015911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990211,0.0002284563,0.0003229335,0.00004374133,0.00009290326,0.0002909162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001652629,0.00006539767,0.9967583,0.000007668513,0.0000407944,0.00007931115,0.0006126728,0.00009813946,0.0007881239,0.00006904908,0.00006360953,0.001251757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001450719,0.00002762378,0.9986727,0.000001374066,0.000006102612,0.00005763311,0.001042443,0.000104982,0.00002306451,0.00002043268,0.0000402146,0.000001986095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998026,0.00001831168,0.00001158791,0.000006019841,3.677468e-7,8.536859e-7,0.00003941481,4.026931e-7,0.0001203706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998115,0.00001136955,0.00002153727,0.000003195148,9.75984e-7,0.000001270513,0.00003913324,5.158277e-7,0.0001106646],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02385288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04742807,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01102728200305699,"score_gpt":0.2213284044876688,"score_spread":0.2103011224846118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}