{"id":"W2027070044","doi":"10.7557/2.32.2.2261","title":"The reintroduction of boreal caribou as a conservation strategy: A long-term assessment at the southern range limit","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rangifer","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Woodland caribou; Boreal; Population; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Poaching; Geography; Taiga; Habitat; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biology; Wildlife; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001162611,0.0002348287,0.0002465131,0.0009526981,0.0007302531,0.0007178492,0.0004221967,0.0003680559,0.0003019503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001268119,0.0001030312,0.0002317149,0.0007951054,0.0005104036,0.000462513,0.0004144166,0.0002308324,0.00005557938],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001405868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001364555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1582527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4295521,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996573,0.00007799316,0.00002793776,0.00004104713,0.000123374,0.00007242055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988004,0.00009398298,0.0004293503,0.00002537941,0.0004291112,0.0002217715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006902783,0.00006337177,0.9804896,0.00009015315,0.0000606716,0.0005573577,0.002367105,0.0001986232,0.0008328498,0.00005954107,0.0001319502,0.01507971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001285768,0.0001870469,0.9967031,0.00003582622,0.00003342018,0.0002051176,0.001573391,0.0001650074,0.00007709146,0.000012211,0.001002045,0.000004378956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968466,0.002334053,0.00005211089,0.00009989343,0.000004991162,0.000009669329,0.00005763008,0.000002157628,0.0005928303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996362,0.002815341,0.0001055504,0.00006169988,0.00001562556,0.00001105063,0.0001291187,8.356564e-7,0.0004986054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1582527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3146632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01463886997370135,"score_gpt":0.2515491033417098,"score_spread":0.2369102333680084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}