{"id":"W2027078416","doi":"10.1007/s11367-012-0505-9","title":"Using life cycle thinking to analyze environmental labeling: the case of appearance wood products","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"FPInnovations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Certified wood; European union; Environmental economics; Product (mathematics); Life-cycle assessment; Standardization; Business; Ecological footprint; Quality (philosophy); Sustainable products; Carbon footprint; Product lifecycle; Environmental resource management; Sustainable development; Sustainability; Environmental science; Computer science; Marketing; Production (economics); New product development; Greenhouse gas; Economics; International trade","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003689141,0.0005517582,0.0002707599,0.001973577,0.002070616,0.004000274,0.001189771,0.001767984,0.00425664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007132523,0.0002891678,0.0009248044,0.001697983,0.003020807,0.00394536,0.001044588,0.001514571,0.000212337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005850698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003502507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02301153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03034943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988954,0.000584276,0.00002470944,0.00008581682,0.0001992992,0.0002103472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939741,0.004648364,0.0003284069,0.0002280658,0.0006406739,0.0001802527],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000339824,0.000895785,0.02757858,0.0002745996,0.0000978471,0.003292235,0.01476174,0.2346945,0.004703283,0.6142522,0.002261074,0.09684835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006516153,0.0002111473,0.009105954,0.0002352804,0.00008161106,0.0003951042,0.0279506,0.6160716,0.00521649,0.3213015,0.01924757,0.0001180502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7818533,0.0002971166,0.1478878,0.00202652,0.00004324017,0.0002838375,0.0001193334,0.00008259756,0.06740631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520601,0.0001474249,0.04468966,0.00008492495,0.000006506179,0.00005853764,0.00007144479,0.00003490928,0.002846498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02301153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04575521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02303218125751603,"score_gpt":0.3215375939709078,"score_spread":0.2985054127133918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}