{"id":"W2027078416","doi":"10.1007/s11367-012-0505-9","title":"Using life cycle thinking to analyze environmental labeling: the case of appearance wood products","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"FPInnovations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Certified wood; European union; Environmental economics; Product (mathematics); Life-cycle assessment; Standardization; Business; Ecological footprint; Quality (philosophy); Sustainable products; Carbon footprint; Product lifecycle; Environmental resource management; Sustainable development; Sustainability; Environmental science; Computer science; Marketing; Production (economics); New product development; Greenhouse gas; Economics; International trade","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002116229,0.0001749945,0.0002222877,0.00005323815,0.0002274391,0.0000663597,0.0008897024,0.00003860562,0.0004030521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002044087,0.0001072328,0.0001343179,0.0001512941,0.0002128601,0.0005771105,0.0005789427,0.000305961,0.00002299981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007765184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006703946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003121763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002049956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976555,0.0002108859,0.0006339966,0.0001624984,0.001010462,0.0003266492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987147,0.000110992,0.0005572067,0.0003350303,0.00002670549,0.0002553974],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003770179,0.002322014,0.6006528,0.00002926698,0.0007767555,0.0002288292,0.01077609,0.3073786,0.06386989,0.0006696459,0.000593645,0.01232545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00175875,0.0003733224,0.9458607,0.0001262544,0.0002800922,0.00222423,0.01759516,0.01802955,0.008492402,0.002290641,0.002370486,0.000598352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993099,0.0002843492,0.001127425,0.004357486,0.0004548132,0.0002524474,0.00001021505,0.000005425015,0.0004088779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995155,0.00003320258,0.003296418,0.001082047,0.0003858981,0.000004087822,0.000001057944,0.00001737023,0.00002496394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.345208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4413138,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02303218125751603,"score_gpt":0.3215375939709078,"score_spread":0.2985054127133918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}