{"id":"W2027177214","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00686.x","title":"The Ethical Analysis of Risk","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Informed consent; Institutional review board; Confidentiality; Research ethics; Balance (ability); Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Subject (documents); Psychology; Task (project management); Actuarial science; Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Business; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1162461,0.001123064,0.002415712,0.005011349,0.003142118,0.008803329,0.002646104,0.006821802,0.003470706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1997872,0.0007399276,0.001208313,0.004060961,0.0295416,0.007225337,0.005918687,0.008667406,0.001264117],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006818696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02173326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002349812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001865052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8158422,0.1372788,0.008013619,0.004388781,0.03276711,0.001709613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7922743,0.1680515,0.009366452,0.01190122,0.0171828,0.001223733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001767951,0.00002174986,0.0005239904,0.001398882,0.00007965765,0.0001679618,0.002072279,0.0003620098,0.0001076252,0.9129653,0.02048456,0.06179834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002508926,0.0000602552,0.0008701746,0.007662288,0.00007064487,0.0009101263,0.002291025,0.0005351402,0.0003302745,0.7405724,0.2466309,0.00004168743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004822143,0.2782299,0.2393204,0.220037,0.006410887,0.002525289,0.000409305,0.000126239,0.2481187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4031914,0.2196714,0.2485539,0.07815728,0.01072846,0.011235,0.0003857483,0.0002607931,0.02781604],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1162461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6147755,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7203642937941083,"score_gpt":0.6826195619799805,"score_spread":0.03774473181412774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}