{"id":"W2027237522","doi":"10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.05.014","title":"Peak efficiency calibration for attenuation corrected cylindrical sources in gamma ray spectrometry by the use of a point source","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Radiation and Isotopes","topic":"Nuclear Physics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Point source; Attenuation; Calibration; Homogeneous; Photon; Computational physics; Physics; Gamma ray spectrometry; Point (geometry); Radioactive source; Gamma ray; Optics; Chemistry; Nuclear physics; Radiochemistry; Detector; Mathematics; Geometry; Statistical physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003424518,0.000997027,0.000921672,0.002051183,0.0007188555,0.002158709,0.00198955,0.002052557,0.001615323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00628331,0.001030433,0.0007450507,0.002747801,0.0007767899,0.001824766,0.001705422,0.000948309,0.001127857],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001374162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001004957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007028945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00106504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974871,0.0007720587,0.00009281193,0.000457325,0.001075095,0.0001156294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962775,0.001390008,0.0003914931,0.0006272268,0.001252108,0.00006166306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002103088,0.0001292859,0.01315857,0.0006334392,0.0002073885,0.0002385019,0.0006037112,0.01149068,0.8305929,0.009047732,0.0009656373,0.130829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006595361,0.0003205132,0.009927114,0.00009037791,0.0002357371,0.0008957125,0.00007905765,0.02665068,0.9539468,0.001662946,0.006034596,0.00009042756],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1451294,0.002534202,0.8461166,0.0001296867,0.00005677502,0.0001536517,0.0001887186,0.001706262,0.003984748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6759351,0.001786864,0.3184592,0.000133556,0.0000300325,0.0001169041,0.0003933693,0.0009094846,0.002235455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003424518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01811081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0088060130477425,"score_gpt":0.2108534370618631,"score_spread":0.2020474240141206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}