{"id":"W2027288650","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v62i3.790","title":"An Instrument to Objectively Measure Pharmacist Professionalism as an Outcome: A Pilot Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"Medical Education and Admissions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rasch model; Construct (python library); Rating scale; Pharmacy; Psychology; Medical education; Scale (ratio); Construct validity; Pharmacist; Outcome (game theory); Item response theory; Measure (data warehouse); Psychometrics; Medicine; Family medicine; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02313859,0.000710493,0.0005872073,0.001057044,0.0009846592,0.0007866173,0.0006977674,0.001025149,0.001919301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02890873,0.0004262981,0.0008595822,0.0006147821,0.001049207,0.001261772,0.001238233,0.001820453,0.0009046661],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008311614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002369071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007585168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00104433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886212,0.007362618,0.0007833348,0.0005200288,0.002199536,0.0005132948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757632,0.01306289,0.002084621,0.001990434,0.005511592,0.001587298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008016771,0.1428331,0.5217379,0.0008199287,0.0002974603,0.0007171884,0.01584976,0.001394282,0.01437598,0.001079631,0.003744623,0.2891333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005466875,0.2851801,0.677412,0.0001934434,0.0002354214,0.0006937534,0.005626814,0.007654904,0.00917659,0.0006138081,0.007614386,0.0001318907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872754,0.00004727471,0.004257484,0.0001896461,0.00005503248,0.006461774,0.0002670304,0.00003762931,0.001408514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645638,0.000107323,0.01883499,0.0003175945,0.00006255071,0.01448487,0.0005133305,0.00002078826,0.00109476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02313859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12237,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1290938397551158,"score_gpt":0.4426125342732082,"score_spread":0.3135186945180924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}