{"id":"W2027288650","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.v62i3.790","title":"An Instrument to Objectively Measure Pharmacist Professionalism as an Outcome: A Pilot Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","topic":"Medical Education and Admissions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rasch model; Construct (python library); Rating scale; Pharmacy; Psychology; Medical education; Scale (ratio); Construct validity; Pharmacist; Outcome (game theory); Item response theory; Measure (data warehouse); Psychometrics; Medicine; Family medicine; Clinical psychology; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009320262,0.0001855354,0.0002989557,0.0002430906,0.0004366375,0.00007914002,0.0004417196,0.00002050006,0.002075809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008766814,0.0001141219,0.00007636952,0.0003109963,0.00006823662,0.0002704708,0.000009445454,0.0007171441,0.00005931059],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003076917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006544395,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002996953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001240346,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980543,0.0002194896,0.0005149724,0.000182751,0.0006755064,0.000352984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934247,0.00002665645,0.0001834694,0.000263066,0.0004496959,0.005652421],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006891892,0.04372334,0.3103941,0.00008203463,0.00131766,0.006303456,0.1460431,0.00006980154,0.01705361,0.002186905,0.155663,0.3102711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02394422,0.07939578,0.7402649,0.0005528658,0.001061496,0.001680322,0.02679516,0.0001490897,0.002720731,0.00197896,0.1203851,0.001071336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.907778,0.0001232506,0.000006133466,0.08908648,0.001256326,0.0008318459,0.000008130585,0.00001354041,0.0008963278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730999,0.000003510735,0.0001060626,0.02546407,0.0006144996,0.000009075293,0.000004428252,0.00001821947,0.0006801972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4298708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1290938397551158,"score_gpt":0.4426125342732082,"score_spread":0.3135186945180924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}