{"id":"W2027380983","doi":"10.1080/14634980490281191","title":"A multivariate approach for evaluating progress towards phytoplankton community restoration targets: Examples from eutrophication and acidification case histories","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management","topic":"Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"","keywords":"Phytoplankton; Eutrophication; Environmental science; Bay; Community structure; Algal bloom; Environmental remediation; Aquatic ecosystem; Ecology; Hydrology (agriculture); Oceanography; Nutrient; Geology; Contamination; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004078307,0.0003776028,0.0003399262,0.002491131,0.0008918704,0.000519569,0.0005297834,0.0003668983,0.0009507798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01414316,0.0001324869,0.0004209531,0.002386543,0.0006295702,0.000367223,0.001112422,0.0004888971,0.00007889279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001077404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006263136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01655114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0513992,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965597,0.002292189,0.0002056469,0.0001741639,0.0006315526,0.0001367861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923825,0.004327021,0.001261467,0.0005346946,0.001154976,0.00033939],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001035957,0.0006454391,0.7526289,0.0005875877,0.0003416176,0.002210569,0.01534559,0.01163006,0.01015101,0.002844274,0.003495023,0.1990839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005611448,0.001526737,0.9004948,0.0001383708,0.0002553079,0.003770515,0.01657462,0.05058651,0.0115183,0.005258614,0.00966105,0.000159068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9605323,0.0004351029,0.03375049,0.0002166846,0.00001293086,0.0003473637,0.000591776,0.00004705757,0.004066249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961308,0.0002566983,0.03656227,0.00003386869,0.000008343719,0.0002694342,0.0004967007,0.00001852164,0.001046182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01655114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03290957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07020872648779906,"score_gpt":0.3253129132636091,"score_spread":0.25510418677581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}