{"id":"W2027383848","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4522.2006.00065.x","title":"POTENTIAL ANTIOXIDATIVE EFFECTS OF CACTUS PEAR FRUIT (<i>OPUNTIA FICUS‐INDICA</i>) EXTRACT ON RADICAL SCAVENGING AND DNA DAMAGE REDUCTION IN HUMAN PERIPHERAL LYMPHOCYTES","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Food Lipids","topic":"Botanical Research and Applications","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Konkuk University","keywords":"Chemistry; PEAR; DNA damage; Cactus; Scavenging; DNA; Antioxidant; Adduct; Food science; Biochemistry; Botany; Organic chemistry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003182249,0.0001094028,0.0002309746,0.00004147438,0.0001410253,0.00005394424,0.0001654834,0.000092161,0.00007040836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009010958,0.00004918082,0.0001141119,0.0002534614,0.0001451171,0.0001681092,0.00003083398,0.000275606,0.000001297063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006383963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002182665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001059125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005959368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987722,0.0001255474,0.000369634,0.0001547599,0.0003475348,0.0002303091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993659,0.0001775023,0.0002263247,0.00004212317,0.00006443784,0.000123657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008916545,0.0002953233,0.0007297384,0.00001427983,0.00001699108,0.00001127407,0.00003060866,0.00003205732,0.9867755,0.0004060163,0.0002094577,0.01138964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001155026,0.003243668,0.7466727,0.0002162923,0.00002865509,0.00007071258,0.0001536156,0.0001019071,0.2455156,0.001882862,0.0007847605,0.0001740721],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987904,0.0002627329,0.00002322073,0.0005608564,0.00006926597,0.0001351583,0.000009133539,0.00000711269,0.0001420577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991115,0.00005839012,0.0001162639,0.00001507844,0.0006581664,0.000003034917,0.000005836977,0.000001536323,0.00003023127],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.745943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2005536,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007626686153431351,"score_gpt":0.2350047953516378,"score_spread":0.2273781091982064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}