{"id":"W2027383848","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-4522.2006.00065.x","title":"POTENTIAL ANTIOXIDATIVE EFFECTS OF CACTUS PEAR FRUIT (<i>OPUNTIA FICUS‐INDICA</i>) EXTRACT ON RADICAL SCAVENGING AND DNA DAMAGE REDUCTION IN HUMAN PERIPHERAL LYMPHOCYTES","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Food Lipids","topic":"Botanical Research and Applications","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Konkuk University","keywords":"Chemistry; PEAR; DNA damage; Cactus; Scavenging; DNA; Antioxidant; Adduct; Food science; Biochemistry; Botany; Organic chemistry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008673761,0.000445332,0.0001903229,0.0003574653,0.0001557596,0.0001451993,0.0001025017,0.0002824948,0.0009922902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001329589,0.0000768958,0.0001459762,0.0001619638,0.0001100628,0.0001060212,0.00008311013,0.0001583673,0.0001174792],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006553903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007649691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003943365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004081165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999654,0.000008904564,0.000003190795,0.000006309779,0.000007488033,0.000008672851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999938,0.00001746291,0.00001314024,0.000003466623,0.00001188039,0.00001603343],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005847907,0.0001010583,0.0007103651,0.0002515773,0.00001842969,0.0001470058,0.00003519379,0.00004843306,0.9910668,0.00003347091,0.00005251652,0.006950364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006637568,0.004146983,0.04933003,0.00004172845,0.000135222,0.0006211287,0.00006256809,0.000323853,0.9421301,0.00004593051,0.003082485,0.00001364558],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954228,0.003052155,0.0002395408,0.00004787143,0.00001311839,0.00001735701,0.0001425793,0.00001968312,0.001044791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967602,0.001351699,0.000650701,0.00005871878,0.00002451337,0.00001721901,0.0002737888,0.000003393594,0.0008599142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0009922902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003319561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007626686153431351,"score_gpt":0.2350047953516378,"score_spread":0.2273781091982064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}