{"id":"W2027604537","doi":"10.2298/abs0503193r","title":"Implementation of GIS technologies in assessment and protection of natural values of Tara National Park","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Biological Sciences","topic":"Botany and Plant Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Biological Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"National park; Biodiversity; Geography; Deciduous; Beech; Fauna; Indigenous; Natural (archaeology); Endemism; Ecosystem; Ecology; Agroforestry; Forestry; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Archaeology; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003797939,0.00005927861,0.0001833035,0.00003364003,0.00006293461,0.000002257458,0.0001528802,0.00004214969,0.00002025374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007747502,0.00002144511,0.00003587284,0.0002295592,0.001150108,0.00006671234,0.00008556032,0.00005350213,7.205104e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004290091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000102934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000207746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007401871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992504,0.00007883458,0.0002829989,0.0001494555,0.0001314745,0.0001068309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992144,0.0005140537,0.0002206483,0.00001497528,0.00002775667,0.000008138913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002031167,0.00006095254,0.5108517,0.000007308427,0.000007965038,6.15459e-8,0.00009768368,0.000008746752,0.3673231,0.001933179,0.000002610721,0.1196864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007826763,0.0007124663,0.94485,0.00001725832,0.000002055564,9.730561e-7,0.002062971,0.0001484151,0.04237952,0.009677352,0.00002945621,0.00004132686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981311,0.0003729124,0.000003284996,0.000938822,0.00001659299,0.0001498635,0.00003870061,0.000008309122,0.0003404178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980938,0.0003725999,0.001503492,0.000006904274,0.00000853555,0.000008582518,0.000003812048,9.928008e-8,0.000002130742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4339982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4237619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04082199173118322,"score_gpt":0.3073176982383426,"score_spread":0.2664957065071594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}