{"id":"W2027632923","doi":"10.1177/1070496502238661","title":"The Multilateral Fund and China's Compliance With the Montreal Protocol","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Environment & Development","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China; United Nations Development Programme","keywords":"Ratification; Montreal Protocol; Treaty; China; Negotiation; Business; Compliance (psychology); Incentive; International trade; Government (linguistics); Economics; International economics; Finance; Political science; Law; Politics; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001181497,0.0001106896,0.00009365324,0.000018603,0.001366427,0.0001009619,0.0004385147,0.00002255101,0.0002134451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001136773,0.0000434825,0.00002463353,0.00004674955,0.000381103,0.0001276756,0.00007069724,0.0001812593,0.00003231103],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001337381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004425519,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000440618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001984542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986067,0.000151798,0.0002630627,0.00007475727,0.000677094,0.0002265797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994065,0.000141164,0.0002712092,0.00009236729,0.00002736743,0.00006138701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002027878,0.001033551,0.04186023,0.00004966946,0.001466909,0.0001140103,0.4090818,0.001359852,0.000748145,0.01164678,0.06391761,0.4666936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006751551,0.00008160943,0.3610688,0.00005229122,0.00001572215,0.00002655666,0.001537434,0.00008755931,0.0001572031,0.0003567374,0.6358115,0.0001294517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7287546,0.0008963009,0.001082955,0.1521374,0.0005747916,0.03669095,0.000003148814,0.00003815055,0.07982172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844725,0.0005277466,0.001206407,0.000322569,0.0001742299,0.0009903425,2.795105e-7,0.00001124136,0.01229473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5718939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999337,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0335857379868395,"score_gpt":0.2684237722017397,"score_spread":0.2348380342149002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}