{"id":"W2027632923","doi":"10.1177/1070496502238661","title":"The Multilateral Fund and China's Compliance With the Montreal Protocol","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Environment & Development","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China; United Nations Development Programme","keywords":"Ratification; Montreal Protocol; Treaty; China; Negotiation; Business; Compliance (psychology); Incentive; International trade; Government (linguistics); Economics; International economics; Finance; Political science; Law; Politics; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03600236,0.0005149154,0.0003509858,0.001839438,0.006986248,0.006491655,0.001957024,0.004104747,0.006651855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05625156,0.0003118588,0.0005337892,0.001747703,0.005524235,0.00227128,0.004889638,0.003925399,0.0002351009],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02401009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09339502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3378372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2724335,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9705948,0.01104065,0.001293129,0.001292207,0.009655777,0.006123563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758354,0.009657038,0.00283049,0.002249373,0.006871214,0.002556439],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009034629,0.00006459179,0.0129002,0.00008832382,0.00004529534,0.0004094009,0.003541067,0.002227206,0.0005591018,0.921495,0.02752619,0.03105318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005020002,0.0003615939,0.09264337,0.0005473757,0.0001419535,0.0002090696,0.004674522,0.01071587,0.003079573,0.13972,0.7469553,0.0004494177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2486861,0.003688585,0.008685554,0.1709802,0.0007569973,0.001624578,0.0005869896,0.0002219422,0.564769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416679,0.0006338517,0.003263211,0.008575503,0.0001420616,0.0004586467,0.0001644035,0.00002935447,0.0450651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3378372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6717416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0335857379868395,"score_gpt":0.2684237722017397,"score_spread":0.2348380342149002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}