{"id":"W2027662984","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0008","title":"Flogging a Dead Book?: Prospects for the Scholarly Book and the University Press in Australia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Diversification (marketing strategy); Incentive; Publication; Commercialization; Face (sociological concept); Project commissioning; Scholarly communication; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Management; Political science; Social science; Law; Economics; Business; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005814469,0.000174668,0.0005025772,0.00215466,0.01093254,0.01954188,0.001172156,0.00816584,0.01748829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01491179,0.0003914049,0.0002711347,0.002720336,0.01366227,0.01802159,0.008691112,0.00852643,0.001767785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007768905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01924906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03426532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05797229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961506,0.001626096,0.000122462,0.0002219697,0.001066417,0.0008125766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864687,0.005446371,0.001253294,0.000431723,0.002050837,0.004349053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004897936,0.0001320215,0.00258532,0.0004571214,0.000008993845,0.001125132,0.04210789,0.0001765359,0.0003567277,0.7600412,0.1182499,0.07471024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001504232,0.00007170428,0.006472165,0.0006289535,0.000009688297,0.0005208621,0.03418152,0.0003159918,0.0002260761,0.03842244,0.9190863,0.00004932602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.100013,0.07548288,0.0009841665,0.5064194,0.004040809,0.0000497211,0.00004577976,0.00007614909,0.3128881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6135181,0.0345138,0.00144304,0.05423908,0.002814823,0.00008975778,0.00004950371,0.0001059065,0.2932261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9804581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0681318,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09801996760654007,"score_gpt":0.2432928856582466,"score_spread":0.1452729180517065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}