{"id":"W2027662984","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0008","title":"Flogging a Dead Book?: Prospects for the Scholarly Book and the University Press in Australia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Diversification (marketing strategy); Incentive; Publication; Commercialization; Face (sociological concept); Project commissioning; Scholarly communication; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Management; Political science; Social science; Law; Economics; Business; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00934385,0.0001728725,0.0002897396,0.0003027931,0.001296967,0.06016557,0.002129976,0.0001376432,0.00008025552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003975305,0.0001041331,0.0001669226,0.0001251671,0.0003919977,0.1877211,0.0002969281,0.003017807,0.000001605614],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001560883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000138153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001505485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005437327,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979023,0.0004802826,0.0005590012,0.0001889527,0.0005373163,0.0003321048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964664,0.0008089189,0.000677496,0.0004488647,0.001469816,0.00012852],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008916433,0.0001384099,0.006668805,0.00004790572,0.0002392883,0.0000246915,0.1036412,0.00001022221,0.00005707283,0.7979878,0.08762166,0.002671288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003917242,0.0001373305,0.01797227,0.0002309211,0.0001555484,0.00005133837,0.01334486,0.0001946113,0.00003188333,0.008152825,0.9555893,0.0002218969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6202707,0.1061519,0.001922785,0.115043,0.005001767,0.003669738,0.0001032351,0.0002364558,0.1476004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847117,0.0008066602,0.0009338419,0.001567379,0.0006888269,0.000009922198,0.000002853549,0.00002617907,0.0112526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8679676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992823,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09801996760654007,"score_gpt":0.2432928856582466,"score_spread":0.1452729180517065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}