{"id":"W2027817044","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.013","title":"Criteria and indicators for the assessment of community forestry outcomes: a comparative analysis from Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Community forestry; Recreation; Citizen journalism; Context (archaeology); Forest management; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Forestry; Descriptive statistics; Business; Local government; Political science; Geography; Public administration; Economics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01561324,0.0004590256,0.0009417614,0.01069532,0.004009271,0.003845248,0.001411673,0.0006079649,0.001570605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03675835,0.0001884518,0.0006740575,0.02008424,0.002467065,0.001257408,0.002102357,0.0007998682,0.0001038279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05630102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06489006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9672779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894103,0.002250167,0.0006369895,0.00032961,0.006458897,0.0009140182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562976,0.01277292,0.002724179,0.0007780636,0.0252192,0.002208082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001126774,0.0003042351,0.7989859,0.001220389,0.0005010426,0.000324597,0.01235699,0.003931501,0.000568398,0.01423226,0.005143122,0.1613048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007702158,0.0002821035,0.9534137,0.0008578742,0.000562832,0.0001872152,0.02427372,0.004404427,0.0008789169,0.003080627,0.01187913,0.0001024835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716985,0.004807667,0.001735266,0.0008930438,0.00002410895,0.0002671046,0.002140625,0.00001761374,0.01841607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958191,0.001027867,0.00165534,0.00004688974,0.000003748198,0.00007361499,0.0008136021,0.000009953807,0.0005497998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05630102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4084944,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01599756707531348,"score_gpt":0.2831877260391453,"score_spread":0.2671901589638319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}