{"id":"W2027827493","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.007","title":"Discussion and Challenges in the Use and Interpretation of Utility Assessment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Toronto General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Preference; Scopus; Quality of life (healthcare); Outcome (game theory); Quality-adjusted life year; Quality (philosophy); Economic evaluation; Health care; Actuarial science; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Cost effectiveness; Statistics; Nursing; Risk analysis (engineering); Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3369509,0.001227321,0.003473961,0.004680487,0.004682769,0.01616195,0.01405225,0.03645964,0.005882828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.596514,0.001844356,0.003903566,0.005505349,0.0306115,0.02075555,0.009168374,0.06004901,0.00171244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01309951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01590962,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01515689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01548088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6977847,0.2199489,0.027023,0.01170202,0.04003718,0.003504192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2087546,0.7286205,0.008338523,0.01286035,0.038222,0.003204022],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002081366,0.0001301201,0.005403963,0.001013227,0.0002932271,0.001199322,0.005543758,0.002661525,0.0002333991,0.5484253,0.3291541,0.1057339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001642212,0.00009655413,0.003247374,0.005547255,0.0001338119,0.001943619,0.004953758,0.008077886,0.0004279898,0.7076655,0.2674408,0.0003012152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006136672,0.00277805,0.005267112,0.9872074,0.002123001,0.0000256337,0.00008801353,0.00001967077,0.001877502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07117663,0.007449611,0.04138542,0.8271834,0.04914406,0.0006242951,0.0001787389,0.0002499805,0.002607829],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3369509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8176576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.388823841484858,"score_gpt":0.4571862922687505,"score_spread":0.06836245078389241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}