{"id":"W2028261273","doi":"10.1037/a0030398","title":"Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1038,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Michael Smith Health Research BC; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Prestige; Popularity; Dominance (genetics); Dominance hierarchy; Social group; Social status; Social perception; Perception; Gaze; Cognitive psychology; Aggression; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001685372,0.000452445,0.0003860892,0.001779069,0.001391761,0.004301316,0.0005971461,0.001183792,0.00521916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006997196,0.0003841025,0.0002916438,0.0007063807,0.005142906,0.003508361,0.002587229,0.001178586,0.0008171833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005355763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005888636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002834135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00541904,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982515,0.0004906644,0.00004650041,0.0004029867,0.0005698411,0.0002383975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992487,0.00204948,0.002619237,0.0006639793,0.0006550794,0.00152524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003588794,0.00122852,0.4694323,0.001333998,0.000702648,0.001343271,0.05639634,0.0003306522,0.06810617,0.05200439,0.005281921,0.340251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001355686,0.001837388,0.9151832,0.0003777091,0.000273347,0.001386911,0.0213628,0.0007603979,0.00798406,0.02717315,0.02335598,0.0001695572],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403355,0.005057023,0.002773739,0.001653918,0.0001236842,0.00001808744,0.00007904489,0.00002642128,0.04993272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951549,0.001127567,0.0008901868,0.0004401032,0.00006240836,0.00001606123,0.0000498249,0.00001280791,0.002246142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00521916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01745981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.125216491971856,"score_gpt":0.4158574662644271,"score_spread":0.2906409742925711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}