{"id":"W2028397071","doi":"10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.04.044","title":"Assessing potential control options for the invasive tunicate Didemnum vexillum in shellfish aquaculture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aquaculture","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Aquaculture; Biology; Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis; Tunicate; Fishery; Oyster; Crassostrea; Pacific oyster; Shellfish; Ostreidae; Aquatic animal; Pearl oyster; Fouling; Ecology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Sea urchin; Pearl","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003180324,0.0002107039,0.0002165806,0.00002437748,0.0004493087,0.00007910014,0.0005420315,0.0002239292,0.004659791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002541274,0.0001302239,0.0001514888,0.0002111475,0.0004081448,0.0006078627,0.0001796703,0.0003553206,0.0003512695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008907061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002115527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004532246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004855805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998669,0.0001059779,0.0002728783,0.0003814699,0.0001611333,0.0004095009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992734,0.0001750523,0.0001338212,0.0003098838,0.00002876679,0.0000791087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006045798,0.001743786,0.4706336,0.00009870491,0.0007873912,0.0002400973,0.0220561,0.003869722,0.08957745,0.03549227,0.3644062,0.01049008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001802035,0.0001432429,0.9111243,0.00002478548,0.0001702515,0.00003941583,0.003494094,0.000891771,0.002125222,0.00700708,0.07270835,0.0004694568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7457234,0.001558063,0.008876912,0.02708286,0.002230953,0.005943231,0.0002233416,0.0003461249,0.2080151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922699,0.0001227984,0.001360506,0.002011964,0.0001137511,0.0001782162,0.00003190181,0.00001628016,0.00389462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4404907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03180343003522138,"score_gpt":0.2491281837310547,"score_spread":0.2173247536958333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}