{"id":"W2028399289","doi":"10.1145/1148550.1148565","title":"Enquête sur les pratiques de tests d'utilisabilité","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Strengths and weaknesses; Computer science; Promotion (chess); System usability scale; Usability engineering; Usability inspection; Domain (mathematical analysis); Web usability; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1056116,0.001897354,0.00208753,0.007492146,0.003349798,0.01022683,0.00391551,0.007838,0.006619249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3419688,0.00144283,0.001922638,0.007187766,0.006814899,0.01612232,0.002913869,0.0131947,0.00304048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005053389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005937142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007407622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8531106,0.0850616,0.01046723,0.006262835,0.04296435,0.002133378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3952088,0.5101856,0.01293831,0.009092768,0.06960455,0.00296996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009883902,0.0004695073,0.01756479,0.00614633,0.000284322,0.000646255,0.02484836,0.003733514,0.01330831,0.05258905,0.04659844,0.8328227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000304483,0.003338571,0.06192751,0.009943251,0.0002977313,0.004183052,0.03070761,0.008137066,0.03161505,0.01953999,0.8292292,0.000776428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1492222,0.3229058,0.3468438,0.1162851,0.01426827,0.0006423715,0.0009273618,0.003617243,0.04528791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6085746,0.1759709,0.1489804,0.01645337,0.0122482,0.001404102,0.002395421,0.002524242,0.03144877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1056116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5585342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03489486338325252,"score_gpt":0.2913905805091833,"score_spread":0.2564957171259307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}