{"id":"W2028493440","doi":"10.5860/lrts.51n1.30","title":"A Review and Analysis of Library Availability Studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Library Resources and Technical Services","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Circulation (fluid dynamics); Branching (polymer chemistry); Measure (data warehouse); Library circulation; Variation (astronomy); Library science; Operations research; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Library automation; History; Mathematics; Database; Engineering; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004678511,0.0009661765,0.002940837,0.01866646,0.0005195747,0.002084357,0.001805367,0.001284814,0.005613418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01763039,0.0007216739,0.001434267,0.02566727,0.0007689133,0.002449122,0.0009323117,0.000955751,0.001287456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002221892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006870341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00490949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01066929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971983,0.0006863496,0.0007084072,0.0003120897,0.00101161,0.00008326136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796358,0.0142066,0.002462591,0.0003101449,0.003101446,0.0002833567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001048899,0.00007182267,0.00162428,0.3074921,0.0009126101,0.000396629,0.0005292885,0.0002885905,0.0004963313,0.002156682,0.02785029,0.6580765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004155834,0.0002268125,0.0137872,0.2375287,0.003752636,0.002047982,0.001039644,0.0001232223,0.0005875257,0.001683297,0.7391139,0.00006746389],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002193588,0.9987639,0.00006639186,0.000216942,0.00005354937,0.00001222615,0.00007651684,0.000003768931,0.0005872322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001481467,0.9979876,0.0001638058,0.0001384076,0.00005268622,0.00001926986,0.00006522716,0.000001416654,0.00009006131],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02474266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04232461346282407,"score_gpt":0.3033460443170178,"score_spread":0.2610214308541937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}