{"id":"W2028653974","doi":"","title":"Problematising the Construction of Journal Quality: An Engagement with the Mainstream","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Journal ranking; Construct (python library); Citation; Privilege (computing); Proxy (statistics); Mainstream; Quality (philosophy); Ranking (information retrieval); Promotion (chess); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Politics; Epistemology; Information retrieval; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1909962,0.001224735,0.003580777,0.02807265,0.01037673,0.0525301,0.006617161,0.007782859,0.001983318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3151525,0.00128505,0.001254741,0.02287708,0.1050937,0.04404907,0.01874212,0.01037688,0.0003461211],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01856786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006176618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004836226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7823451,0.1371896,0.01628855,0.01307493,0.04749679,0.003605092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5045382,0.3944818,0.02885722,0.02056752,0.04658579,0.004969392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006714531,0.0001013874,0.0154732,0.001445716,0.0001589135,0.0002355843,0.06796327,0.001119034,0.0007032431,0.836046,0.003421202,0.07326537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003284334,0.00008604279,0.006734227,0.0008837479,0.00004973311,0.0002900188,0.03735601,0.005374265,0.0005061643,0.9221244,0.02645318,0.0001094719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1362595,0.02596211,0.3983538,0.3831282,0.002157695,0.0005242974,0.0001778188,0.0002878274,0.05314884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8765715,0.005721627,0.1065409,0.005887798,0.002890306,0.000454537,0.00006497206,0.0002759258,0.001592426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9719273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4298522153998736,"score_gpt":0.5091114348103812,"score_spread":0.07925921941050762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}