{"id":"W2028670499","doi":"10.1057/jt.2012.20","title":"Measuring consumer-based brand equity across brand portfolios: Many-facet Item Response Theory perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Targeting Measurement and Analysis for Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Brand equity; Marketing; Scale (ratio); Perspective (graphical); Reliability (semiconductor); Facet (psychology); Psychology; Computer science; Business; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03952695,0.0003123802,0.0006346345,0.0008122479,0.0008052493,0.0006766724,0.000280236,0.0001005945,0.0001597882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006620068,0.0002795244,0.0006546511,0.0007604385,0.0001077141,0.001234328,0.0001186455,0.0002705897,0.000006275057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002066908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006736688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003138273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002074816,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965461,0.0003725199,0.00108927,0.0003302684,0.001055184,0.0006066841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954719,0.000582311,0.001611391,0.0002226519,0.002021049,0.0000906967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007596217,0.0004290666,0.9074377,0.0004431294,0.002138733,0.000006136127,0.0005483216,0.0001687672,0.04547926,0.0003225765,0.0008971631,0.03453293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003490799,0.00001645826,0.9739504,0.0003388544,0.004976922,0.000007983925,0.004529682,0.002190938,0.001288101,0.0002522235,0.008348048,0.0006096274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856831,0.004987076,0.00771171,0.0005156906,0.0004797212,0.0003082262,0.000009351766,0.00004809926,0.0002569526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985728,0.0000552139,0.0004873569,0.0001866864,0.0005643485,0.00001617351,0.00001162942,0.00003322678,0.00007255134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06651267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08668181964376011,"score_gpt":0.3112532149310414,"score_spread":0.2245713952872813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}