{"id":"W2028690092","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.09.017","title":"Complete mixability and asymptotic equivalence of worst-possible VaR and ES estimates","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Insurance Mathematics and Economics","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Equivalence (formal languages); Limit (mathematics); Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Value at risk; Value (mathematics); Expected shortfall; Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Risk management; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007197284,0.0001244174,0.000367242,0.00008008711,0.0001008453,0.0002635453,0.0001550285,0.00005294398,0.00004789851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004031497,0.00009675429,0.00002740604,0.00009219568,0.0002782628,0.0004080803,0.0001049804,0.00004709142,0.00001662205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000658023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001530249,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005015131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001412737,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988655,0.00001688227,0.0005994608,0.0002697626,0.0001030799,0.0001452424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983249,0.0008637346,0.0003131026,0.0002934671,0.0001145552,0.000090252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001508389,0.0001232637,0.8938168,0.000226335,0.00003749062,5.889009e-7,0.003179792,0.003916048,0.00039643,0.0232823,0.0001660691,0.07483979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000288891,0.00006017574,0.290949,0.00005126094,0.00001160625,0.00001977316,0.0004298779,0.3367292,0.0002413786,0.3708937,0.0001399048,0.0001853137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958096,0.0004111424,0.002581732,0.0001470709,0.00006040357,0.0001987497,0.00003814516,0.00001025162,0.0007429318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625617,0.002003237,0.03533304,0.00002790791,0.00001111082,0.000008009319,0.000001467315,0.00000773179,0.00004576286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6028678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3945526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0593064509207077,"score_gpt":0.2980791980521414,"score_spread":0.2387727471314338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}