{"id":"W2028745449","doi":"10.1139/t08-035","title":"Cone penetration test (CPT) methods for end-bearing assessment of open- and closed-ended driven piles in siliceous sand","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Cone penetration test; Pile; Geotechnical engineering; Penetration test; Penetration (warfare); Submarine pipeline; Bearing capacity; Bearing (navigation); Reliability (semiconductor); Engineering; Structural engineering; Geology; Marine engineering; Computer science; Operations research; Subgrade","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001391731,0.001381259,0.0005022675,0.003208088,0.0003570523,0.0006137839,0.001285488,0.0007607649,0.0008835332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005298988,0.0003456466,0.0004160413,0.00210663,0.0004026919,0.0008126809,0.0006795336,0.000688299,0.0003237703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006035604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008070609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006713377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01987159,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980106,0.0002796188,0.00008472428,0.0001713509,0.001395472,0.00005837961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962437,0.001338128,0.0007923945,0.0002419239,0.001286135,0.00009773798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000671991,0.0004989179,0.1225112,0.0007667852,0.0001340993,0.0005737361,0.0005337644,0.3579851,0.1161481,0.002838309,0.002992373,0.3943455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003408671,0.0007428331,0.06404224,0.00008627783,0.00005222595,0.0008798416,0.0002730131,0.8713417,0.05911173,0.0009634855,0.002299292,0.0001732146],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2868821,0.0008726842,0.7026994,0.000101785,0.0001138286,0.0005030003,0.001287682,0.001252343,0.006287097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8754088,0.0007440703,0.1216941,0.00003438355,0.00001798193,0.0002370258,0.0006183774,0.00005415547,0.001191154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006713377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01334864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0254949308672696,"score_gpt":0.2985330219945868,"score_spread":0.2730380911273171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}