{"id":"W2028819775","doi":"10.1037/cjep2007003","title":"Lexical access in younger and older adults: The case of the mass/count distinction.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Noun; Lexicon; Context (archaeology); Dual (grammatical number); Psychology; Reading (process); Ambiguity; Linguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009435186,0.0002538104,0.000397214,0.000894513,0.0002819446,0.0006940891,0.000198093,0.0006997986,0.003040416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006314358,0.0002149839,0.0001462722,0.000273276,0.0005611085,0.001604112,0.0006971193,0.0003868963,0.0006034054],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002311084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002249824,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002895009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004581662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996681,0.00003574492,0.00005028008,0.0000980082,0.0001011981,0.00004669799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981019,0.0006185215,0.0006167129,0.0001383683,0.0002135956,0.0003109444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004160341,0.0003074019,0.8184441,0.0002131992,0.0001033862,0.006764438,0.01540353,0.00006279215,0.04128825,0.001918181,0.001635728,0.1096987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005529632,0.0005614331,0.9816004,0.00004356572,0.00004769869,0.008944568,0.002610671,0.0002558088,0.001458762,0.002343948,0.002057126,0.00002069973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958204,0.0009979669,0.0002477161,0.0001739478,0.00003078867,0.00001029994,0.0001156889,0.000007304531,0.002595939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985259,0.0002017912,0.0001994171,0.0001645826,0.0000293211,0.000009166898,0.00008654749,0.00000433698,0.0007790466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003040416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01017118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03809253324160809,"score_gpt":0.3387443856749642,"score_spread":0.3006518524333561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}