{"id":"W2028867409","doi":"10.1080/00223890903510399","title":"Measuring Empathy in Couples: Validity and Reliability of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index for Couples","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Personality Assessment","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Interpersonal Reactivity Index; Empathy; Reliability (semiconductor); Index (typography); Test validity; Interpersonal communication; Psychometrics; Validation test; Reactivity (psychology); Interpersonal interaction; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Perspective-taking","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003767467,0.000136223,0.0003378901,0.00008480228,0.0001091419,0.00002387669,0.0002343862,0.0001738275,0.00008130488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002619704,0.00009399794,0.0002277427,0.0001253931,0.0002534906,0.0001675333,0.00006064159,0.0009556385,2.628863e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001668817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002293987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001755717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003833842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983551,0.0002461604,0.000596426,0.0001860875,0.0004318298,0.0001844008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980587,0.0006979239,0.0006778616,0.0002341348,0.0002573076,0.00007406843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001874108,0.0005056297,0.9927801,0.00006942488,0.00004406153,0.000001983572,0.003198007,0.00005015569,0.001396459,0.001194332,0.00006689692,0.0005055474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001081867,0.0001338776,0.9896345,0.00006032941,0.00005932225,0.00003228632,0.003188387,0.003644913,0.00004769662,0.001598313,0.0004217879,0.0000966809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99196,0.00005316719,0.004841384,0.001365543,0.00106031,0.0002911669,0.00003767837,0.000004288048,0.0003864043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982309,0.00001320685,0.001483934,0.00004041176,0.000144184,0.00001082264,0.000001928968,0.00000979073,0.00006485049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006270811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4151827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06357459783886579,"score_gpt":0.4090672328904604,"score_spread":0.3454926350515947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}