{"id":"W2029100651","doi":"10.1002/art.27571","title":"The diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging in spondylarthritis: An international multicenter evaluation of one hundred eighty‐seven subjects","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arthritis & Rheumatism","topic":"Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universität Zürich; Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; University of Alberta","keywords":"Medicine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Spondylarthritis; Spondylitis; Sacroiliac joint; Radiology; Ankylosing spondylitis; Edema; Ankylosis; Rheumatology; Medical diagnosis; Nuclear medicine; Internal medicine; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003808693,0.0007359318,0.0005357453,0.001157554,0.0007067278,0.0008222986,0.0004094543,0.0007835247,0.0006612249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007268793,0.0005355761,0.0004248494,0.0005481691,0.0007184799,0.0005284764,0.0005965929,0.0003813154,0.0003662662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002365877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002137658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009110221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006562293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975892,0.0009526285,0.0003025497,0.000526439,0.0004724467,0.0001566458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953375,0.001635812,0.00153962,0.0003578384,0.0006731877,0.0004559814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003187231,0.000105565,0.9962685,0.0000209364,0.00009675724,0.0001066168,0.0003397987,0.00004578738,0.000713566,0.000009681738,0.00007126021,0.001902686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007495823,0.0007893181,0.9970009,0.00001256729,0.00007920632,0.0007469405,0.0003219846,0.0003485815,0.0003126058,0.00001356501,0.0002888256,0.0000106732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995142,0.0001215049,0.0001130624,0.00001033496,0.000004271812,0.00002386871,0.00006986268,0.000004087383,0.0001387906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993901,0.00005646558,0.0002325518,0.00001841959,0.00001012571,0.00002447765,0.0002182993,0.000002604672,0.00004691324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003808693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02014256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01615845813983682,"score_gpt":0.2817148726729896,"score_spread":0.2655564145331528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}