{"id":"W2029175262","doi":"10.1017/s0266462313000329","title":"QUANTITATIVE PATIENT PREFERENCE EVIDENCE FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A CASE STUDY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Health technology; Medicine; COPD; Inclusion (mineral); Quality of life (healthcare); Preference elicitation; MEDLINE; Medical literature; Intensive care medicine; Family medicine; Health care; Psychology; Pathology; Nursing; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3122991,0.001574887,0.006106767,0.0187932,0.002943803,0.008112041,0.003555821,0.00624319,0.005787932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5776163,0.002025305,0.008622617,0.02583126,0.004325836,0.01023565,0.005838499,0.003455766,0.0003995567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01256914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01630452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004075702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009591108,"domain_scores_codex":[0.42646,0.4501534,0.08650487,0.004926877,0.03011558,0.001839352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2003994,0.7366484,0.03431795,0.01017932,0.01785367,0.0006012832],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001593279,0.0004116918,0.01454284,0.7603677,0.01224126,0.004657927,0.0331572,0.001302711,0.0008049028,0.01993598,0.00486317,0.1461214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001934558,0.00226784,0.009832529,0.8664815,0.02083651,0.005951367,0.02691155,0.002067564,0.00144901,0.01310478,0.04885199,0.0003107601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.07770067,0.8203447,0.03772194,0.02458129,0.001439726,0.02410057,0.001978185,0.00007529872,0.01205767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6122508,0.2301644,0.1033602,0.0124635,0.0006019851,0.03962999,0.0007744355,0.00007229234,0.0006824366],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3122991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8480576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6747914635814267,"score_gpt":0.634768036284478,"score_spread":0.04002342729694874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}