{"id":"W2029191936","doi":"10.1006/jeth.2000.2735","title":"Nash Equilibrium and the Evolution of Preferences","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Nash equilibrium; Economics; Action (physics); Population; Best response; Evolutionarily stable strategy; Aggregate (composite); Equilibrium selection; Repeated game; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Game theory; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001918506,0.0003042557,0.0006255622,0.0006113834,0.0007486833,0.002621414,0.0008693977,0.00138028,0.005377481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01277872,0.000376779,0.0004865746,0.0007279231,0.002092314,0.004561729,0.000988384,0.00137664,0.0004592895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001576005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00102579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005354179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003586127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990352,0.0005496622,0.00003083371,0.0001248238,0.0001327303,0.0001267718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964164,0.00261167,0.0002721855,0.000157979,0.000335323,0.0002064246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005587082,0.00002740488,0.0008980235,0.00003257518,0.00002277802,0.00007797972,0.0004136918,0.01812869,0.0004552529,0.9711067,0.0007885502,0.007992425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001721752,0.00001113825,0.0004238165,0.000008547941,0.000006566878,0.00004136494,0.0001347379,0.04614309,0.00009198899,0.9517989,0.001311693,0.00001092484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4790991,0.001685207,0.4192124,0.005285724,0.0001408526,0.0000863411,0.0003452027,0.0001459552,0.09399918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615532,0.0006548361,0.02511736,0.0001461868,0.00004149676,0.00005923504,0.0001017651,0.00002860035,0.01229739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005377481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01798946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05873728306807544,"score_gpt":0.3374401153105667,"score_spread":0.2787028322424912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}