{"id":"W2029191936","doi":"10.1006/jeth.2000.2735","title":"Nash Equilibrium and the Evolution of Preferences","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Nash equilibrium; Economics; Action (physics); Population; Best response; Evolutionarily stable strategy; Aggregate (composite); Equilibrium selection; Repeated game; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Game theory; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00776114,0.00005303264,0.0002239652,0.0001075979,0.00004372801,0.00005018048,0.0005136952,0.00002865185,0.0004824677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005839954,0.00002777244,0.000101738,0.00008107719,0.0004339557,0.0002679407,0.0000605995,0.00009292905,0.00004802879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003149588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008383444,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000047784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005240351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987088,0.0003608668,0.0006365845,0.00008898135,0.0001286494,0.00007606614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996319,0.00256295,0.000758191,0.000227247,0.00008860121,0.00004404008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000404037,0.00001815284,0.003022112,9.562851e-7,0.00002602517,3.95374e-7,0.0005419204,0.0003464662,0.0006447399,0.9811738,0.0004620738,0.01335939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005092525,0.00003830709,0.006000645,0.000007512087,0.00001649418,0.00007838115,0.002646348,0.0001943896,0.0002265811,0.9881607,0.002089504,0.00003194503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784829,0.0007338552,0.002323739,0.0007979487,0.0001786503,0.00005639875,0.00000309663,0.000002166078,0.01742127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985216,0.00005699235,0.00008392356,0.00003633806,0.0001222899,0.000001117229,5.286281e-8,0.000002532351,0.001175153],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02003872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5282683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05873728306807544,"score_gpt":0.3374401153105667,"score_spread":0.2787028322424912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}