{"id":"W2029294889","doi":"10.1097/pts.0000000000000139","title":"Development of an Electronic Pediatric All-Cause Harm Measurement Tool Using a Modified Delphi Method","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Patient Safety","topic":"Patient Safety and Medication Errors","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Delphi method; Vetting; Patient safety; Process (computing); Delphi; Medicine; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Psychology; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; Health care; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07304359,0.001204252,0.001015803,0.007693852,0.001700221,0.002629866,0.002129924,0.001341573,0.01015286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07124338,0.001098211,0.00197046,0.003541105,0.001353269,0.003413627,0.005683347,0.001635513,0.002018965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003328329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01082533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001375001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002035368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9090002,0.07036499,0.00832455,0.002360944,0.008152783,0.001796639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9408677,0.03532778,0.003160339,0.003243106,0.01641331,0.0009877379],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009710619,0.001430158,0.02503307,0.007456642,0.0003437613,0.001075863,0.06226854,0.01354101,0.01572829,0.02379674,0.01708032,0.8312745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002614974,0.01044309,0.1347641,0.01623008,0.0009815468,0.00349991,0.1873636,0.2013031,0.06576401,0.0901133,0.2849665,0.001955918],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1964175,0.0003654596,0.6462044,0.003782237,0.0003126242,0.120358,0.002134124,0.001261952,0.02916372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1178401,0.0002535403,0.8207936,0.0005106686,0.00002893002,0.05809376,0.0005710938,0.00006620777,0.001841969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07304359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.386296,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1758131800889784,"score_gpt":0.4378021846279564,"score_spread":0.261989004538978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}