{"id":"W2029309387","doi":"10.1038/sj.jes.7500509","title":"The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Mobile phone; Recall; Phone; Recall bias; Information bias; Selection (genetic algorithm); Selection bias; Statistics; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01166671,0.0001456156,0.0007781761,0.0001027717,0.0001873865,0.000002883333,0.0002143335,0.0001079322,0.00002066562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006670409,0.00008983732,0.00006998586,0.0002678768,0.004846941,0.0003740118,0.0001760203,0.0002900206,6.073678e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002391415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003468347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002215142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004814046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962789,0.001352056,0.001478196,0.0002489833,0.0002637269,0.000378128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913189,0.006250453,0.002156743,0.0001408215,0.00001457474,0.0001184712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009540331,0.00009867693,0.9417741,0.0000436247,0.00001227081,0.000001239172,0.0005550578,0.006858277,0.04277058,0.00004931843,0.0001858672,0.00755562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004396086,0.001537518,0.9860262,0.00008252629,0.00002779066,0.00003002902,0.0005004702,0.0003160202,0.007653088,0.00311395,0.000197338,0.00007549184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888585,0.01030046,0.00007257627,0.0003785811,0.0001509934,0.0002201857,0.000007737935,0.000001589281,0.000009355153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722672,0.02549084,0.002009149,0.0001827614,0.0000225627,0.00000627794,2.368413e-7,0.000004700912,0.00001622896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04425211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07721604184619654,"score_gpt":0.3638513012851606,"score_spread":0.2866352594389641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}