{"id":"W2029315570","doi":"10.1007/s10530-014-0659-4","title":"Invasive species contribute to biotic resistance: negative effect of caprellid amphipods on an invasive tunicate","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological Invasions","topic":"Marine Ecology and Invasive Species","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Biology; Tunicate; Invasive species; Ciona intestinalis; Introduced species; Resistance (ecology); Ecology; Competition (biology); Predation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008171994,0.0003705942,0.0006470034,0.00009875701,0.0003530192,0.00002640046,0.0007888599,0.0002994101,0.003878435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008787637,0.0002463411,0.0001757737,0.0004823275,0.00127393,0.0001466866,0.0006450564,0.0003214283,0.00117874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001631234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002810114,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001118891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002375616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968445,0.001076707,0.0004737396,0.0007664587,0.000276221,0.0005623286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939836,0.004640774,0.0002306692,0.0007044505,0.00004886999,0.0003916545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002273796,0.001036472,0.4166445,0.00008780712,0.000175486,0.00006333659,0.001129415,0.001173329,0.4936639,0.04454811,0.037562,0.001641836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009811274,0.006818343,0.6601309,0.0001007065,0.00004195825,0.000004113317,0.0001592328,0.00001539045,0.310207,0.005820121,0.01520815,0.0005129629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586184,0.00001945301,0.00008668836,0.001230515,0.0001987548,0.000795923,0.0000800193,0.00007373418,0.03889653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995431,0.00017638,0.0006094173,0.00166166,0.0001045768,0.0000879562,0.00005317499,0.00001542595,0.001860385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2434864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06923110340941059,"score_gpt":0.2575423511266405,"score_spread":0.1883112477172299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}