{"id":"W2029397850","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.09.004","title":"Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy: a population-based study of trends, associations, and outcomes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery","topic":"Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Children's Hospital; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Health Canada; McGill University Health Centre","keywords":"Medicine; Incidence (geometry); Logistic regression; Socioeconomic status; Appendicitis; Population; Health care; Acute appendicitis; General surgery; Pediatrics; Demography; Environmental health; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001227005,0.0001516608,0.0008635406,0.001227607,0.00006091007,0.00002000471,0.00006869471,0.00006633176,0.00009221862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008150904,0.0001203022,0.0002204198,0.0005723949,0.000007041965,0.0001029246,0.00002761591,0.0001627964,0.000002653975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006903848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001003107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009716918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001712647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978934,0.000150847,0.0009805515,0.0001518901,0.0006369444,0.0001863772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970975,0.001196285,0.001208022,0.0001738465,0.0001771428,0.0001472033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002846279,0.0009779668,0.9836953,0.00006919861,0.0000924387,0.00001941178,0.00007846942,0.00002050648,8.244127e-7,0.00001031057,0.01205834,0.002948761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002271988,0.0003925593,0.9957343,0.00001050795,0.001073888,0.000002359745,0.0001217954,0.00002322835,0.000003190028,0.00002261183,0.0002460375,0.00009757342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982405,0.0005748077,0.00002899739,0.000362479,0.0005264204,0.0001599862,0.000005260657,0.00001415936,0.00008742913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997966,0.0003140523,0.0001538136,0.0001797209,0.00129789,0.00000542586,0.00001328585,0.00001796494,0.00005187338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01203896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4905782,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02432798022099426,"score_gpt":0.2962221102703691,"score_spread":0.2718941300493748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}