{"id":"W2029493835","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0057125","title":"Assessing DNA Barcoding as a Tool for Species Identification and Data Quality Control","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Identification and Quantification in Food","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum","funders":"Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences; Youth Innovation Promotion Association; Chinese Academy of Sciences; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"DNA barcoding; GenBank; Biology; Phylogenetic tree; Intraspecific competition; Interspecific competition; Evolutionary biology; Mitochondrial DNA; Species complex; Phylogenetics; Genetics; Gene; Zoology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1420665,0.001270586,0.001379369,0.008854952,0.002581452,0.006309795,0.002642529,0.002296816,0.001392503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3034396,0.000739046,0.001149178,0.007604512,0.004397778,0.005504905,0.004052465,0.002552629,0.0006980843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004089409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005735868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005987389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00483741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.816807,0.07170445,0.02010042,0.01383534,0.07604033,0.001512507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5436682,0.2246158,0.07067814,0.02716191,0.1298464,0.004029565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008627296,0.0003853252,0.454468,0.004774507,0.001821257,0.000546723,0.007476578,0.01284106,0.03221287,0.01922523,0.008203892,0.4571819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002239928,0.003158713,0.3798992,0.00521318,0.00249375,0.002398051,0.007409603,0.2035755,0.1843606,0.05347962,0.1567466,0.001041316],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2040909,0.01052455,0.7648911,0.003643953,0.0007993983,0.001858171,0.003359043,0.002712368,0.008120477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5110461,0.001560963,0.4801362,0.001445482,0.0002071209,0.001178043,0.002961094,0.000383503,0.001081388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1420665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7513286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1593644818525359,"score_gpt":0.3529273780730925,"score_spread":0.1935628962205567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}