{"id":"W2029517174","doi":"10.1007/s11336-005-1295-9","title":"Limited Information Goodness-of-fit Testing in Multidimensional Contingency Tables","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychometrika","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":327,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Goodness of fit; Statistics; Contingency table; Mathematics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Estimator; Null hypothesis; Econometrics; Applied mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00781257,0.0002112035,0.0005417665,0.004460074,0.0001166946,0.0001351061,0.0006696324,0.0001455356,0.0002736798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2022282,0.0001675721,0.0001167139,0.01974521,0.00009248346,0.0008476142,0.0001324587,0.0002371728,0.0001016242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004490419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005763673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007460023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003029518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995376,0.0003017911,0.001941244,0.0004325419,0.001473932,0.0004744723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520485,0.04518643,0.001144576,0.0006288972,0.0009003746,0.00009116396],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003135585,0.0001315613,0.7983192,0.00001075904,0.000005341207,0.000001760337,0.00007195706,0.00064252,0.001094438,0.0008706569,0.002127281,0.1966931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001113677,0.00008941839,0.9705344,0.0000619472,0.000005535932,0.000008643244,0.0004027146,0.004740093,0.000547709,0.01072206,0.01154721,0.000226541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589913,0.0008784543,0.01151606,0.0001518333,0.00111252,0.0002752692,0.00003032965,0.00008026232,0.02696391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8926264,0.00001377235,0.106965,0.00007614618,0.00009641025,0.00001293925,0.00001151637,0.000009823052,0.0001879736],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1964666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.948692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4253619074110371,"score_gpt":0.4361651235139779,"score_spread":0.01080321610294077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}