{"id":"W2029616528","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2006.01.005","title":"Multidisciplinary evaluation of the sustainability of Red Sea fisheries using Rapfish","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries Research","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Government of Canada; Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Fishery; Stock assessment; Multidisciplinary approach; Sustainability; Fisheries management; Leverage (statistics); Geography; Stock (firearms); Fisheries science; Fishing; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Ecology; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003706285,0.0001421679,0.0002345813,0.00008933737,0.0003494066,0.00004337112,0.00070326,0.0001192723,0.01895454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001261874,0.0001088933,0.0001126999,0.001366909,0.002532616,0.0003086658,0.001668861,0.0003368224,0.000007165244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005287772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002646064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01875634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003543012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949194,0.001104813,0.0004351751,0.0003823391,0.002604419,0.000553837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817,0.0002039443,0.0001293248,0.0008825179,0.000546145,0.00006806273],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001100833,0.0001794566,0.9779741,0.0001058565,0.000009826272,0.00000170343,0.0002709961,0.0004424157,0.003326144,0.00006448446,0.01070672,0.006808258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005115942,0.0001356373,0.9426345,0.0000136055,0.0000158055,0.000002933441,0.001349509,0.01848343,0.005857376,0.006468116,0.02437585,0.0001516562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6688758,0.00001049111,0.00002230808,0.0008138366,0.00003888843,0.0007523409,0.00001128378,0.0000123186,0.3294628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864146,0.000007718321,0.0003163201,0.000003582252,0.00004267525,0.00006940124,0.000009186296,0.00003216343,0.01310439],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3175388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9877778,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08727697797673498,"score_gpt":0.3678192856621232,"score_spread":0.2805423076853882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}