{"id":"W2029616528","doi":"10.1016/j.fishres.2006.01.005","title":"Multidisciplinary evaluation of the sustainability of Red Sea fisheries using Rapfish","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fisheries Research","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Government of Canada; Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Fishery; Stock assessment; Multidisciplinary approach; Sustainability; Fisheries management; Leverage (statistics); Geography; Stock (firearms); Fisheries science; Fishing; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Ecology; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006021015,0.0006467619,0.0004642757,0.001830267,0.0005917298,0.001548743,0.0005232358,0.0006947493,0.001089402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006731637,0.0002052843,0.0008168879,0.001171114,0.0005641206,0.001730731,0.001074553,0.0003043033,0.0001810668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001516108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008961565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006505511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01372518,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965733,0.001920057,0.0002165694,0.0004013869,0.0007163375,0.0001723444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951255,0.001948192,0.0009050532,0.0004452862,0.001241102,0.0003349673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005677634,0.001791312,0.6252299,0.0004858493,0.001948687,0.0009637195,0.000834112,0.1231804,0.0414604,0.002251256,0.000403774,0.1957732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003867001,0.01755316,0.7713526,0.0001461495,0.001741893,0.0007054398,0.007057406,0.1392602,0.05422192,0.004571756,0.00283826,0.0001643822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979913,0.00007101724,0.0007828457,0.00003329257,0.000002631416,0.00001652959,0.00004340294,0.000006939598,0.001052039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997544,0.00006715368,0.001912307,0.000009988988,0.000002585752,0.00001463339,0.00006857515,0.000002285873,0.0003784119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006505511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03184253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08727697797673498,"score_gpt":0.3678192856621232,"score_spread":0.2805423076853882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}