{"id":"W2029705687","doi":"10.2166/wst.2006.366","title":"An evaluation of full-scale activated sludge dynamics using microbial fatty acid analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Science & Technology","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Activated sludge; Sewage treatment; Biomass (ecology); Wastewater; Microbial population biology; Environmental science; Community structure; Settling; Population; Waste management; Dynamics (music); Full scale; Environmental engineering; Pulp and paper industry; Ecology; Biology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003322161,0.0002915112,0.0002973157,0.0007656264,0.0005469606,0.0004799295,0.0002462585,0.0002295907,0.0005040485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006700651,0.0001450571,0.0002000699,0.0006815065,0.0002183461,0.0002894469,0.0002641739,0.0001715822,0.0001695282],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001059719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001155834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2748556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997244,0.00002217868,0.00001064371,0.00004115004,0.0001606445,0.00004091677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994794,0.00007096742,0.00005562887,0.0000179943,0.0003058036,0.0000702543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004690171,0.00018451,0.1326437,0.000126488,0.00005268548,0.0002289572,0.0005557531,0.001073875,0.8387423,0.00003768757,0.00008832663,0.02579669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001441768,0.001153684,0.8319783,0.00001088648,0.00007183449,0.0002803406,0.0007250583,0.004837706,0.1596891,0.00003635836,0.00116695,0.00003529331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991097,0.00006893616,0.0004234367,0.000007540052,8.868729e-7,0.00001826961,0.0001877163,0.000009316415,0.0001742008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996574,0.0002095168,0.001857062,0.00001214202,0.000001474562,0.00002032567,0.0005692512,0.000004686096,0.0007516163],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.122059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2426972,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01163870467395116,"score_gpt":0.2458077332731539,"score_spread":0.2341690285992027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}