{"id":"W2029773741","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0017018","title":"It's the Recipient That Counts: Spending Money on Strong Social Ties Leads to Greater Happiness than Spending on Weak Social Ties","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Happiness; Prosocial behavior; Interpersonal ties; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Family ties; Altruism (biology); Psychology; Demographic economics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003107984,0.0002164557,0.0002630839,0.000118392,0.0004260643,0.00005813496,0.0002401782,0.0001880175,0.004647657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002817996,0.000157924,0.0000892462,0.0001190595,0.0001061259,0.00006882346,0.00004579982,0.0003961445,0.003713797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001081728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000458217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008945853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002104579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984227,0.00019022,0.0002026833,0.000376356,0.0003968053,0.0004111809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995213,0.00007847576,0.0001108255,0.0002042002,0.00002208498,0.00006318034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005214985,0.005199275,0.3494833,0.0001346504,0.002508206,0.00009216089,0.1418898,0.000007899575,0.005986697,0.2758391,0.1941567,0.01948718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008706459,0.0007820921,0.9782434,0.000252749,0.0001760927,0.000004631155,0.006692844,0.000009521248,0.003425291,0.001715117,0.007230726,0.0005968594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5960016,0.000009332161,0.0000249226,0.001022329,0.000729842,0.0001843097,0.00001604317,0.00008654527,0.4019251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854547,0.000007889314,0.00004578469,0.0006148563,0.001156458,0.00005457532,0.000009223573,0.00003376367,0.01262277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6287601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2376239690696549,"score_gpt":0.3305515782607324,"score_spread":0.09292760919107751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}