{"id":"W2029790831","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.06.001","title":"Assessment of the expansion related to alkali-silica reaction by the Damage Rating Index method","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Construction and Building Materials","topic":"Concrete and Cement Materials Research","field":"Engineering","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Alkali–silica reaction; Petrography; Materials science; Aggregate (composite); Alkali–aggregate reaction; Composite material; Young's modulus; Cube (algebra); Elastic modulus; Modulus; Thermal expansion; Mineralogy; Geology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001227868,0.000469437,0.0003779152,0.001938709,0.000173691,0.0003328244,0.0003895647,0.0004323816,0.001812703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001479648,0.000169079,0.0003096947,0.0007398415,0.0002647192,0.0006520924,0.0004527662,0.0002990784,0.0004701579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002932188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000199276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00101056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001730071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999101,0.0001507212,0.00004365989,0.00009356807,0.0005635542,0.00004744672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982336,0.0005815155,0.0003543222,0.0001302044,0.000625545,0.00007479532],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001340627,0.0002869553,0.135965,0.0004791676,0.0001838136,0.000284713,0.0002601974,0.0701112,0.5363981,0.002430924,0.0009061,0.2513531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003185805,0.001213103,0.3240084,0.00002713338,0.0001776249,0.0005313855,0.0001739481,0.4111698,0.257881,0.0008787567,0.003759069,0.0001478657],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8053658,0.001164193,0.1781146,0.00004269855,0.0000418911,0.000132852,0.0005242646,0.000591114,0.0140226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820863,0.0002185625,0.01471019,0.000007659359,0.00001468792,0.00002914942,0.0002642469,0.00002430282,0.002644898],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001938709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006493688,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009701249357808386,"score_gpt":0.2953003516539542,"score_spread":0.2855991022961458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}