{"id":"W2029909776","doi":"10.1159/000345604","title":"Cumulative Meta-Analysis for Genetic Association: When Is a New Study Worthwhile?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Heredity","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; University of Toronto; York University; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; SNP; Genetic association; Genetics; Context (archaeology); Genome-wide association study; Trait; Biology; Sample size determination; Genotype; Statistics; Medicine; Gene; Mathematics; Computer science; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2137796,0.001752539,0.01081013,0.00401508,0.001412528,0.007940845,0.003554481,0.006329881,0.005124823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4727136,0.001537221,0.01052309,0.004659962,0.004216206,0.008403913,0.002991944,0.008772372,0.0004613424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003157446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005401379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002337768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00492495,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8006212,0.1692003,0.01065628,0.01012145,0.008844421,0.000556461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4078603,0.5492752,0.01291468,0.02040504,0.007053235,0.002491591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01546345,0.0003089915,0.04255308,0.06240317,0.1559299,0.001926195,0.001283759,0.01988134,0.002699573,0.06132353,0.02443779,0.6117892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01352519,0.005210741,0.03230483,0.04921981,0.1803287,0.002775523,0.001095911,0.07224798,0.002597279,0.5214947,0.118279,0.0009203725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01835851,0.5230294,0.3266322,0.1091127,0.01404373,0.00259983,0.0008706246,0.0007022014,0.004650817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3863807,0.1100123,0.43682,0.04130583,0.01636947,0.005349172,0.0005559069,0.0004942763,0.002712339],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7862204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9695498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.148371273515872,"score_gpt":0.3618152803059576,"score_spread":0.2134440067900857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}