{"id":"W2029913253","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2009.01.001","title":"Use of composite forest commodity price indices for cointegration analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Econometrics; Commodity; Economics; Product (mathematics); Spot contract; Forest product; Time series; Financial economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Finance; Geography; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001107103,0.0001482216,0.0008084528,0.0005613664,0.00007341929,0.0001121563,0.0002749797,0.000113617,0.00003130216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000136509,0.0001560569,0.0005512279,0.000236556,0.00004973776,0.0006573729,0.00002070924,0.0001589712,0.000001493835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001458658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004159553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001869143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001039849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980694,0.00001718486,0.001506022,0.0001893794,0.00002948013,0.0001885098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966093,0.0002442299,0.002594969,0.0002825856,0.0001670845,0.0001018583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002131437,0.0001793167,0.9143673,0.00002526587,0.0003439047,6.169782e-7,0.0001069485,0.01081407,0.000005115899,0.07313518,0.0002320543,0.0005770347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000458231,0.0002550695,0.6302299,0.000009393386,0.0001044648,0.000004162948,0.00001205611,0.302433,0.00001419925,0.06235088,0.003997547,0.0001310975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9396576,0.0001553444,0.05852332,0.0003052213,0.0002024172,0.0001717911,0.0003646971,0.000004412704,0.0006152167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918921,0.000242256,0.007525912,0.0001235478,0.0000907038,0.000001703207,0.00005702976,0.00001013587,0.00005659782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2916189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6363815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03826698606753549,"score_gpt":0.2397128765651756,"score_spread":0.2014458904976401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}