{"id":"W2029974289","doi":"10.1007/s00442-007-0793-0","title":"Foraging behavior by Daphnia in stoichiometric gradients of food quality","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oecologia","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Biology; Daphnia; Foraging; Ecological stoichiometry; Food quality; Predation; Herbivore; Ecology; Optimal foraging theory; Functional response; Cladocera; Food web; Ecosystem; Zooplankton; Predator; Food science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001111011,0.00009152328,0.0001876092,0.0001025082,0.00003825117,0.000005614448,0.0001933708,0.00008065725,0.0004230346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007260114,0.00008475071,0.00003643822,0.0006464524,0.00006145932,0.00007408923,0.00009185688,0.0001014547,0.0000546493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001908871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005348247,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004642228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005184081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99888,0.00004422647,0.0003952782,0.0001985257,0.0002040294,0.000277984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994324,0.000148851,0.0001734887,0.0001793142,0.000004578081,0.0000612976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006059003,0.000173977,0.9919847,0.000009394792,0.000002942943,0.000003241508,0.00009101185,0.00003068425,0.001960486,0.0002273149,0.0002483466,0.005261877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000286437,0.0001454775,0.9979829,0.00000460558,0.000005068659,0.000001608252,0.00008085743,0.0001731734,0.0006150762,0.0001664851,0.0004317543,0.0001065929],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926661,0.00002928392,0.0009984054,0.000006161774,0.0001487697,0.0002352131,0.00002995315,0.00001365803,0.005872437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991475,0.000002318512,0.0006115904,0.00003068448,0.000005568798,0.00001233577,0.00001211761,0.000006673837,0.0001711502],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006481442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4631932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0150899843830863,"score_gpt":0.2734300467115157,"score_spread":0.2583400623284294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}