{"id":"W2030007150","doi":"10.1115/pvp2007-26124","title":"Technical Basis of Proposed New Acceptance Standards for Class 1, 2 and 3 Piping","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Volume 1: Codes and Standards","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kinectrics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Piping; Acceptance testing; Engineering; Class (philosophy); Structural engineering; Forensic engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020261,0.001234874,0.0008205104,0.005641524,0.001874335,0.003288213,0.005243205,0.003287614,0.005186445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04428971,0.001191038,0.001220573,0.001288554,0.002797496,0.003816336,0.002609325,0.004230764,0.003872783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003247405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01077494,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004389887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005837987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.967755,0.003282988,0.003388888,0.002004164,0.02228042,0.001288539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9075827,0.01213139,0.004798875,0.008088663,0.06606582,0.001332583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006601082,0.001433107,0.01726773,0.001326203,0.00006479575,0.001034745,0.002217285,0.03380464,0.0734782,0.3025689,0.04097203,0.5251722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004815944,0.00502868,0.03199723,0.002634278,0.0002608463,0.002577101,0.001375399,0.1848023,0.2695824,0.0784015,0.4219464,0.0009122172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04921741,0.001035284,0.8940661,0.002289714,0.001160216,0.002654211,0.000553426,0.006123338,0.04290023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1841867,0.001059532,0.7825902,0.0008402045,0.0005037089,0.003250075,0.002143306,0.000794537,0.02463176],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.020261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1071516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00931134765772248,"score_gpt":0.2576635166264489,"score_spread":0.2483521689687264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}