{"id":"W2030256295","doi":"10.1071/ah090192","title":"Transparency in pricing arrangements for medicines listed on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Health Review","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme; Transparency (behavior); Negotiation; Listing (finance); Subsidy; Health economics; Business; Drug pricing; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Health care; Pharmaceutical policy; Actuarial science; Economics; Health policy; Finance; Medicine; Law; Pharmacology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1947129,0.0002373608,0.001032243,0.01055453,0.001863012,0.008022332,0.00188336,0.003006942,0.003109597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4639673,0.001067453,0.001245382,0.01371722,0.003155518,0.008682246,0.003417823,0.003973917,0.0004407854],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007989949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01613037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0160215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01430267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6631917,0.1934544,0.05467014,0.00609652,0.07746071,0.00512658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3462737,0.5138946,0.08148997,0.02351324,0.03326433,0.001564176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001012411,0.000240667,0.06850034,0.01201127,0.0004896032,0.001601523,0.02561131,0.003734791,0.004009575,0.3105007,0.06482783,0.50746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005270768,0.0008959296,0.3599952,0.01638531,0.0008808064,0.0026397,0.008950364,0.007591654,0.006820123,0.1010534,0.4935506,0.0007098595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3931483,0.08275606,0.03715672,0.1776698,0.002415227,0.003107586,0.008095031,0.0004258527,0.2952253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9403282,0.01547971,0.02208054,0.01150795,0.001156169,0.0006738412,0.0019415,0.00008135727,0.006750798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1947129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6787588094695151,"score_gpt":0.5442331503762728,"score_spread":0.1345256590932422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}