{"id":"W2030297858","doi":"10.1177/0963947007075979","title":"Foregrounding and refamiliarization: understanding readers' response to literary texts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Foregrounding; Introspection; Defamiliarization; Reading (process); Interpretation (philosophy); Process (computing); Feeling; Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Cognitive psychology; Art; Social psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002855946,0.0005711766,0.0004276327,0.0009030208,0.001305321,0.0046835,0.0009259988,0.002095969,0.002297206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03254738,0.0004329382,0.0002975763,0.0005165794,0.004334598,0.004229211,0.00262988,0.001806697,0.0003939601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007715391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000409593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007649846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008055645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996771,0.002066826,0.0000970188,0.000347368,0.0004787809,0.0002390406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778312,0.01762677,0.002484148,0.0007814894,0.0008432651,0.0004330424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003438405,0.00007393959,0.007321598,0.0002154384,0.00001817405,0.0005339407,0.9519365,0.0001062588,0.02267638,0.001973199,0.0001974673,0.01460328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008658414,0.0008502748,0.08602577,0.0004017105,0.00009545534,0.001069969,0.8694493,0.002485691,0.01503452,0.009579194,0.01479519,0.0001264727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891548,0.0002281899,0.00263124,0.000431993,0.00002075859,0.00003829654,0.0000126452,0.00004189191,0.007440153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975545,0.0001364303,0.001134093,0.0001297747,0.00001661245,0.00002878765,0.00001779609,0.00003209553,0.0009499174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01510382,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01995716902628087,"score_gpt":0.3200350063052413,"score_spread":0.3000778372789604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}