{"id":"W2030297858","doi":"10.1177/0963947007075979","title":"Foregrounding and refamiliarization: understanding readers' response to literary texts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Foregrounding; Introspection; Defamiliarization; Reading (process); Interpretation (philosophy); Process (computing); Feeling; Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Cognitive psychology; Art; Social psychology; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009477776,0.000131983,0.0001612508,0.0004547795,0.00006782251,0.0002540294,0.0001423542,0.0001211495,0.00008667059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003296561,0.0001085374,0.00004869239,0.0001937764,0.00004464506,0.0002395263,0.00004028242,0.0002778637,0.000002969819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008035266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001783999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006153578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007427066,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988818,0.00009104547,0.0003802367,0.0001620463,0.0003120219,0.0001728316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989138,0.0003870021,0.0001892431,0.00009625275,0.0002623543,0.000151311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01333827,0.0003018488,0.005072511,0.00009462563,0.0008502617,0.01762373,0.6204007,0.000002253641,0.02049485,0.2107375,0.004059367,0.107024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01674299,0.003616793,0.2220141,0.00621529,0.0008151905,0.03080389,0.5307108,0.0001179277,0.003300695,0.09779034,0.08538461,0.00248748],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.861392,0.009431084,0.1166238,0.001174011,0.002302114,0.000144287,0.00009687101,0.00002781861,0.008808038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931747,0.00007110361,0.002942071,0.001347461,0.001060935,9.509831e-7,0.00003737064,0.00001613708,0.001349226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2169416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4426025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01995716902628087,"score_gpt":0.3200350063052413,"score_spread":0.3000778372789604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}