{"id":"W2030304247","doi":"10.1289/ehp.0900985","title":"Integrating Omic Technologies into Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment and Environmental Monitoring: Hurdles, Achievements, and Future Outlook","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Health Perspectives","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Syngenta (Canada); University of Victoria","funders":"National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Toxicogenomics; Adverse Outcome Pathway; Government (linguistics); Risk assessment; Process (computing); Omics; Environmental risk assessment; Emerging technologies; Environmental monitoring; Environmental planning; Business; Biology; Computer science; Ecology; Bioinformatics; Computational biology; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006001488,0.0005806037,0.000566349,0.0001195459,0.001469995,0.000064755,0.000328404,0.0003944955,0.0007469073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002197181,0.0005338191,0.00009134231,0.0001215173,0.001677308,0.0004829148,0.000632128,0.00103079,0.0001211691],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002365242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000170539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007142533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004856743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964982,0.0003900768,0.0005864495,0.001271466,0.0003922214,0.0008616063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987515,0.0001368038,0.0003682379,0.0004203133,5.368017e-7,0.0003226742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008152784,0.002187271,0.8117378,0.00001563359,0.00006930516,0.00002960494,0.006934658,0.00003277998,0.02153856,0.0004187796,0.000317389,0.1566367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001105617,0.002812958,0.9212114,0.00001795401,0.00003870067,0.0000682872,0.06543811,0.0003657479,0.0008428915,0.003973606,0.003551584,0.0005731941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880182,0.004141137,0.0001467389,0.005470154,0.0001730934,0.0009564229,0.00004003484,0.0001750501,0.0008791858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708846,0.01677003,0.0112464,0.0005753531,0.0001370993,0.00009236132,0.00003115197,0.00003369444,0.0002293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1560635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007282183838257565,"score_gpt":0.2786313852241274,"score_spread":0.2713492013858698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}