{"id":"W2030322090","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2008.00040.x","title":"Community conserved areas: policy issues in historic and contemporary context","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Geography; Biodiversity; Corporate governance; Documentation; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental planning; Political science; Ecology; Environmental protection; Business; Biology; Economics; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000329702,0.0001501112,0.0001791377,0.0001451742,0.0004754212,0.00002467323,0.0002123104,0.00005487981,0.0001881688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001175508,0.0001585089,0.00003658883,0.0003787144,0.00058784,0.0002526721,0.0002313506,0.0001834033,0.00008313029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000253705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003039935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0490195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002010067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988515,0.0002877948,0.0002560171,0.0002144489,0.0002041631,0.0001861175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993958,0.0001170317,0.0001121928,0.0002793513,0.0000149248,0.00008066252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002779315,0.00005795185,0.9210794,0.00001269758,0.000008878258,0.00002177051,0.003485282,0.00001733594,0.001199848,0.00002641761,0.07371835,0.0003443106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007426185,0.00002226331,0.8871322,0.00001440431,0.000004349622,0.000007834395,0.001027691,0.0002461004,0.00004988376,0.00003796895,0.1105532,0.0001614233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313382,0.0001911071,0.00007567018,0.06560232,0.00006582051,0.0002667671,0.000005486729,0.00005804167,0.002396586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9650113,0.0000675688,0.0001514782,0.03287977,0.00002690977,0.0000126153,0.00002692995,0.000008004389,0.001815435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04700944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9573132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04166179813113901,"score_gpt":0.2192825599418518,"score_spread":0.1776207618107127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}