{"id":"W2030322090","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-263x.2008.00040.x","title":"Community conserved areas: policy issues in historic and contemporary context","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Geography; Biodiversity; Corporate governance; Documentation; Biodiversity conservation; Environmental planning; Political science; Ecology; Environmental protection; Business; Biology; Economics; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007433216,0.0002130892,0.0003017569,0.001567107,0.008792629,0.01238552,0.002200084,0.01024625,0.009672194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01178283,0.0002893876,0.0001860957,0.002544391,0.01992999,0.01096377,0.004767539,0.006682151,0.0002657664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01309154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01086785,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0478428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06314057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962054,0.001822071,0.000121364,0.0003558331,0.0004860766,0.001009321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899003,0.006720628,0.001020506,0.0002628861,0.0009627819,0.001132934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002028236,0.00007779103,0.003580301,0.00044928,0.000008993491,0.0009091074,0.01591526,0.001102422,0.0003686781,0.9203533,0.02566416,0.03155046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002187942,0.00005987319,0.01038628,0.002635048,0.00002697638,0.001005611,0.1062736,0.001450841,0.0003597814,0.3057051,0.5720043,0.00007072927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09649846,0.02491566,0.002179152,0.6983925,0.0007236059,0.0000601883,0.0001242511,0.00003224451,0.177074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472758,0.008525412,0.001675749,0.03514574,0.0006558095,0.00007809529,0.00003952483,0.00001482496,0.006588952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0478428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09512866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04166179813113901,"score_gpt":0.2192825599418518,"score_spread":0.1776207618107127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}