{"id":"W2030326469","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9084-1","title":"Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 NCEHR National Conference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University; National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Session (web analytics); Private sector; Research ethics; Breakout; Public relations; Institutional review board; Political science; Medicine; Business; Engineering ethics; Law; Finance; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1711504,0.0003489956,0.0007751465,0.000477293,0.00143745,0.0001446563,0.001662255,0.007552013,0.0002798771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.339151,0.0002023328,0.0002519847,0.001131788,0.003345803,0.0004036872,0.0004937994,0.1910763,0.00008330448],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02284769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005817855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002447093,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9703092,0.00504126,0.001969945,0.0006153196,0.0210307,0.001033569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.812013,0.15444,0.001285,0.0009624711,0.03036208,0.0009374186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01198228,0.001014111,0.01621765,0.002829363,0.0007988114,0.001053949,0.09818716,0.0007415236,0.04200804,0.684939,0.135937,0.004291066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005113447,0.006598554,0.02471099,0.02118456,0.0002646616,0.002244027,0.005105408,0.0004539838,0.01325697,0.7099766,0.2103675,0.0007233075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09651211,0.004193493,0.0007288003,0.8869649,0.0003162801,0.0005706039,0.0000203277,0.0000440917,0.01064941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7942206,0.1164146,0.006809246,0.05315766,0.002875295,0.00001123981,0.000009159367,0.00008635301,0.02641586],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8338072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7307501712055149,"score_gpt":0.6752627794533599,"score_spread":0.055487391752155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}