{"id":"W2030455168","doi":"10.1177/0886260503253880","title":"Predicting Violent Behavior through A Static-Stable Variable Lens","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Poison control; Injury prevention; Human factors and ergonomics; Suicide prevention; Occupational safety and health; Salient; Variable (mathematics); Sample (material); Social psychology; Criminology; Medical emergency; Medicine; Computer science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008511952,0.0004714284,0.0004027514,0.002284282,0.0004869349,0.0008707374,0.0003374141,0.0002909467,0.002826441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005382778,0.0001674917,0.0004289375,0.001037729,0.0005107146,0.0005137912,0.0007287279,0.0005629277,0.0002708066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003742986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005688375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006600956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993968,0.000281977,0.00004083235,0.00008039511,0.0001325294,0.00006746911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981279,0.0007828621,0.0004682185,0.0001508501,0.0002652751,0.0002050282],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001483994,0.0001318186,0.982492,0.00001194943,0.00005200239,0.00005038515,0.0001555841,0.00102446,0.0002619211,0.0005537376,0.0001946765,0.01492322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000163548,0.0005251865,0.9749223,0.00002804928,0.00006974873,0.0002369297,0.0006957043,0.01944725,0.0007576803,0.002605936,0.0006760508,0.00001885071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941216,0.0001260969,0.003775243,0.00006863386,0.00001083043,0.00003041665,0.0003567798,0.00003056926,0.001479809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980268,0.00004792503,0.001380115,0.000008530857,0.000007195906,0.00001348423,0.0002828183,0.000002740008,0.0002303983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006600956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01312506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.047754036814964,"score_gpt":0.351218440404091,"score_spread":0.303464403589127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}