{"id":"W2030515486","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.023","title":"Approaches for calculating a nation's food ecological footprint—The case of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Per capita; Sustainability; Food security; Hectare; Food systems; Agriculture; Footprint; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Agricultural economics; Sustainable development; Sustainable agriculture; Resource (disambiguation); Geography; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008644767,0.0001396462,0.0001818186,0.00001906854,0.0003662014,0.00000958166,0.0002197486,0.0001293169,0.001111763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069156,0.00008562492,0.00009154595,0.0001992277,0.0004342158,0.00007818333,0.000264343,0.0001615472,0.000005406805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007139387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003883425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006915091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0524429,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986562,0.0001308951,0.0002861122,0.0002177988,0.0001749377,0.0005340615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998879,0.0005454975,0.0001529927,0.0001939838,0.000003271595,0.0002252322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001977443,0.0008229857,0.9827526,0.00002002732,0.00003437133,0.00002284205,0.0005785464,0.0009600817,0.00005457411,0.005510131,0.0008254148,0.008398669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002160619,0.0002697978,0.9918492,8.361857e-7,0.00001965747,0.00005892854,0.00184601,0.0005050458,0.0006557936,0.001174282,0.003245818,0.0001585048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948782,0.00002042239,0.0001351125,0.0004864183,0.00009812318,0.0006344845,0.00001464462,0.0000155365,0.003717096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987664,5.853975e-7,0.0007437814,0.0001921135,0.00004320964,0.0001440729,0.000004128428,0.000007358034,0.00009835901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04552781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998013,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03752584753389601,"score_gpt":0.242166814370585,"score_spread":0.204640966836689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}