{"id":"W2030560722","doi":"10.1136/bmj.b4012","title":"Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Reliability and Agreement in Measurement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":345,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jadad scale; Medicine; Kappa; Publication bias; Funnel plot; Sample size determination; Cohen's kappa; Statistics; Meta-analysis; Correlation; Relative risk; Internal medicine; Mathematics; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6216255,0.003618134,0.01893017,0.01901945,0.002066863,0.01112254,0.004834319,0.009234565,0.005329171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8567865,0.002926907,0.02735662,0.01854809,0.006578136,0.01217608,0.006333839,0.005503887,0.0008179558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01063314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01335465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001847652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001871349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.134407,0.5255243,0.2635272,0.0202992,0.05504835,0.001193972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07244302,0.708156,0.1646973,0.0252089,0.02831884,0.00117593],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01394098,0.0002212679,0.05965591,0.515088,0.2741305,0.0003107625,0.002851541,0.002216209,0.0008158575,0.013372,0.005874976,0.111522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02021836,0.007683179,0.07802325,0.502279,0.2734058,0.002998584,0.001948701,0.0167152,0.003922103,0.04954541,0.04221043,0.001049789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02736874,0.7019529,0.1765728,0.006816653,0.008190444,0.06664485,0.006594533,0.0007838161,0.005075155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.443558,0.08471297,0.2160562,0.007727405,0.003906966,0.2389608,0.003369109,0.0004740024,0.001234448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3783745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4666031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.553386919390064,"score_gpt":0.5654401656422524,"score_spread":0.0120532462521884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}