{"id":"W2030577893","doi":"10.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.014","title":"An improved method for determining zeta potential and pore conductivity of porous materials","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Colloid and Interface Science","topic":"Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Streaming current; Electrokinetic phenomena; Zeta potential; Conductance; Surface conductivity; Conductivity; Resistor; Voltage drop; Surface charge; Materials science; Electrode; Porosity; Chemistry; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Voltage; Current (fluid); Nanotechnology; Composite material; Thermodynamics; Chromatography; Condensed matter physics; Electrical engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006521625,0.00009880077,0.0002547712,0.00009481229,0.0001534057,0.0001663502,0.0001866899,0.00004002508,0.00003353833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009309559,0.00008125395,0.00003875232,0.00009813314,0.0002026681,0.000579547,0.00003867245,0.00009691047,4.453127e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003346784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001624756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004749188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001145405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990571,0.00001694971,0.0004148317,0.0001621604,0.0001672656,0.0001816938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988753,0.00006842271,0.0005116114,0.0001020998,0.0003636648,0.00007889785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001185336,0.00005717336,0.00006665484,0.00003015832,0.0000109846,6.923188e-7,0.0001147586,0.0000281331,0.998328,0.00009986288,0.00005079043,0.001094238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004939713,0.0005339412,0.0001919136,0.00004871526,0.00003602379,0.0003682419,0.0004735862,0.004340729,0.9925098,0.0007290348,0.0001853836,0.00008859308],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878545,0.0001126968,0.01144508,0.00007603029,0.0001931395,0.00005718274,0.00003787065,0.000004158329,0.0002192784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822036,0.00001738973,0.01738694,0.00001545392,0.00009005446,0.000002234691,8.538124e-7,0.000007237551,0.000276231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005941861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.331344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007790582107035742,"score_gpt":0.3092025498822177,"score_spread":0.3014119677751819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}