{"id":"W2030584440","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.014","title":"Understanding the heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas","keywords":"Mixed logit; Preference; Population; Constraint (computer-aided design); Quarter (Canadian coin); Fire protection; Economics; Geography; Public economics; Econometrics; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Microeconomics; Logistic regression; Engineering; Statistics; Mathematics; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002891091,0.000232786,0.0005237667,0.0009132482,0.0003933128,0.002299794,0.0005414286,0.001226727,0.005780003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01782925,0.0002629007,0.0004051352,0.0007571912,0.001229624,0.002582333,0.0007972392,0.001309142,0.0001536846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009719469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003159691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004020954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006219052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990508,0.0005294219,0.0000330942,0.0001227839,0.000102096,0.0001618656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798248,0.01627752,0.001991159,0.0009620068,0.0003657894,0.0005787234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001090082,0.0009296452,0.5566888,0.0001764297,0.001464464,0.0008935759,0.002523471,0.08318987,0.004763123,0.2690412,0.0028193,0.07642006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008981556,0.0001560886,0.300299,0.00004096142,0.000185222,0.0003511606,0.004061818,0.1173022,0.0005673309,0.5750116,0.001881431,0.00005340037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838253,0.00023401,0.008139106,0.001637842,0.00001027455,0.00000919887,0.0001127108,0.000006304636,0.006025142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993384,0.00004415938,0.0003287691,0.00004648897,0.00001293437,0.000002273955,0.00002756646,0.000001606908,0.0001977549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005780003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01933604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3232074251012714,"score_gpt":0.2597427725744224,"score_spread":0.06346465252684902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}